Legal Opinion
Local 36 of International Fishermen & Allied Workers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1949No. 11638PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
The United States initiated this criminal action against the defendants by indictment charging the violation of the AntiTrust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7. The cause was tried before a jury. A verdict of guilty was found. This appeal has been taken upon the main grounds that (1) the indictment does not state a crime, (2) that evidence vital to defense was rejected, (3) that the verdict was against the evidence, (4) that the Court did not properly instruct the jury, and (5) that the method of drawing the juries in this district was improper and that a conviction in…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Edna Goldstein v. Robert E. Kelleher, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Continental Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Thomas D. Clancy, James F. Prindable and Donald KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Edwin Nathaniel Gebhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.