Legal Opinion

Ball v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 11, 1967No. 52004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

This is an unlawful detainer action by William E. Ball, the assignee-purchaser of a “sale and lease agreement” in which the appellant Kemps (Orla Kemp was in fact the operator and principal in the business) were the lessee-purchasers of a bowling alley in Piedmont. The plaintiff sought to recover delinquent rent of $11,215.84 which doubled under the statute (RSMo 1959, § 534.330, V.A.M.S.; Bierkenkamp v. Bierkenkamp, 88 Mo.App. 445) would confer appellate jurisdiction on this court. Const. Mo.Art. 5, Sec. 3, V.A.M.S.; RSMo 1959, § 477.040, V.A.M.S. A jury returned a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lucas Hunt Village Co. v. KleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Sapp v. KeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Kelly v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Wilson v. WattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cordell v. JarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hill v. MorrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API