Legal Opinion
Doe v. Raemisch
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 28, 2012No. Case No. 10-C-911PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John Doe of Connecticut (Doe I) and John Doe of Florida (Doe II) are each adult males who were previously convicted of sex crimes in Wisconsin and are subject to Wisconsin’s sex offender registration and notification statutes, Wis. Stat. §§ 301.45, 301.46 (2009-10)1 Plaintiffs filed this action against the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC), its secretary and the director of the DOC’s Sex Offender Program, alleging that the application and enforcement of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tobin Mueller v. Rick RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- People v. ParillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- McGuire v. StrangeDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2015
- State v. DeAnthony K. MuldrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Belleau v. WallDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.