Legal Opinion

Kraatz v. Brush Electric Light Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Wayne circuit court for damages, upon the claim that he was severely and permanently injured and crippled by an electric shock while trimming lamps on an electric tower in Detroit, on August 19, 1886, at about 9 o’clock in the morning.

The plaintiff’s evidence showed that he had been working for the defendant company as a trimmer from April, 1886, up to the day of the injury. On that day he had trimmed the lamps in 12 or 13 towers before he came to the tower at the corner of Hastings and Marion (now Winder) streets. He went up this tower and trimmed *459three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wales v. LyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Smith v. Township of SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cicotte v. County of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Peterson v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Woodbury v. City of OwossoMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Foss v. RobyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Teachout v. Grand Rapids, Grand Haven & Muskegon Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Sykes v. Village of PortlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Kern v. Arbeiter Unterstuetzungs VereinMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API