Keith & Proctor Amusement Co. v. Bingham
New York Supreme Court
Action by the Kéith & Proctor Amusement Company against one Bingham, as police commissioner of the city of New York, to restrain the police authorities of the city from closing or attempting to close plaintiff’s theater, located in such city, etc., on Sundays. On application for continuance of a preliminary, injunction pendente lite. Application granted.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
This action is brought to restrain the police authorities of New York City from closing or attempting to close on Sundays the theater of the plaintiff, located at No. 112 Bast 125th street. The plaintiff also asks that the defendants be restrained from entering the theater except for the purpose of making such inspection as is lawful, and except for the purpose of preserving the peace or to execute warrants of arrest- of persons on the premises, or other lawful warrants, or for the purpose of making an arrest in good faith for the commission of a felony, or an arrest for a misdemeanor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eden Musee American Co. v. BinghamNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PennyMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- In re HullIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910