Legal Opinion

Cedar Vale Co-Op Exchange, Inc. v. Allen Utilities, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 31, 1985No. 55,887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

This is an action by a supplier of materials against the contractor and his corporate surety on a contractor’s bond.

Defendant Allen Utilities, Inc., (Allen Utilities) contracted with the City of Peru, Kansas, for a public works project concerning sewers, sewage pumping stations, force mains, and a sewage purification plant. As required by K.S.A. 60-1111, Allen Utilities furnished what is commonly known as a contractor’s bond, with Universal Surety Company (Universal) as surety.

In furtherance of several construction projects it had in the area, Allen Utilities contracted with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Leidigh & Havens Lumber Co. v. BollingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Murphree v. Trinity Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Seyb-Tucker Lumber and Implement Co. v. HartleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. David v. DoughtySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. W. Thompson Co. v. Welles Products Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Hope's Architectural Products, Inc. v. Lundy's Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Wichita Sheet Metal Supply, Inc. v. Dahlstrom & Ferrell Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1996
  5. Poly-Flex, Inc. v. Cape May County Municipal Utilities AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API