Cedar Vale Co-Op Exchange, Inc. v. Allen Utilities, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Meyer, J.:
This is an action by a supplier of materials against the contractor and his corporate surety on a contractor’s bond.
Defendant Allen Utilities, Inc., (Allen Utilities) contracted with the City of Peru, Kansas, for a public works project concerning sewers, sewage pumping stations, force mains, and a sewage purification plant. As required by K.S.A. 60-1111, Allen Utilities furnished what is commonly known as a contractor’s bond, with Universal Surety Company (Universal) as surety.
In furtherance of several construction projects it had in the area, Allen Utilities contracted with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rice v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Leidigh & Havens Lumber Co. v. BollingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Murphree v. Trinity Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Seyb-Tucker Lumber and Implement Co. v. HartleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- David v. DoughtySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- J. W. Thompson Co. v. Welles Products Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Hope's Architectural Products, Inc. v. Lundy's Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Wichita Sheet Metal Supply, Inc. v. Dahlstrom & Ferrell Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1996
- Poly-Flex, Inc. v. Cape May County Municipal Utilities AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993