Legal Opinion
Poly-Flex, Inc. v. Cape May County Municipal Utilities Authority
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 20, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-3199 (SSB)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, Senior District Judge:
Presently before this court in this diversity action are plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment. Underlying these motions is a question of first impression relating to the requirements that need be met in order for a supplier in a public works construction project to collect funds from a surety on a statutory bond under the New Jersey Bond Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:44-143 et seq. For the reasons addressed below, the motions of both plaintiff and defendants are denied.
I. Factual Background
A. Landfill Project History
D…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.