Legal Opinion
Bordin v. Rau
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 10, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00449Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 RICHARD BORDIN, Case No. 3:23-CV-00449-CLB1 5 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS 6 v. 7 JON RAU, et. al., [ECF No. 22] 8 Defendants. 9 10 Pending before the Court is Defendant Jon Rau and Josh Rau’s (collectively 11 referred to as “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Richard Bordin’s (“Bordin”) third 12 amended complaint. (ECF No. 22.) Bordin responded, (ECF No. 28), and Defendants 13 replied, (ECF No. 30). For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is 14 granted. 15 I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.