Legal Opinion

Piercy v. Citibank N. A.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hilda G. Schwartz, J.

Defendant moves for an order dismissing the second amended complaint on the grounds, inter alia, that a defense *303is founded upon documentary evidence and the complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Plaintiff, a corporate business executive, entered into a written executive investment advisory agreement with defendant bank in 1972. Plaintiff suffered losses on investments in the advisory account over an approximately three- and a half-year period from October, 1972 to May, 1976 and seeks to recoup those losses from defendant bank, which acted as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of the Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. In re the Accounting of the Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. William H. Waters, Inc. v. MarchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Clark v. American Morgan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hong Kong Deposit and Guar. Co. Ltd. v. HibdonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Huther v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Rochester City Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API