Piercy v. Citibank N. A.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hilda G. Schwartz, J.
Defendant moves for an order dismissing the second amended complaint on the grounds, inter alia, that a defense *303is founded upon documentary evidence and the complaint fails to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff, a corporate business executive, entered into a written executive investment advisory agreement with defendant bank in 1972. Plaintiff suffered losses on investments in the advisory account over an approximately three- and a half-year period from October, 1972 to May, 1976 and seeks to recoup those losses from defendant bank, which acted as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of the Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- In re the Accounting of the Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- William H. Waters, Inc. v. MarchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Clark v. American Morgan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hong Kong Deposit and Guar. Co. Ltd. v. HibdonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Huther v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Rochester City Court · 1989