Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Clarke

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.

This is a motion by the defendant, pursuant to the provisions of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that this court has not jurisdiction over the subject of the action and on the further ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint alleges three causes of action. The first cause of action is brought by the mother of the children against the father for necessaries claimed to have been supplied by her to the children from May, 1949, to the date of the commencement of the action. The second…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Laumeier v. . LaumeierNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Matter of LindgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crane v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. O'Brien v. SpringerNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Porges v. Louis-DreyfusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API