Legal Opinion
O'Brien v. Springer
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
Motion No. 1 seeks an order directing plaintiff to reply to the new matter set np in the answer.
Motion No. 2 seeks an order striking from the answer allegations “ Fourth to Fifteenth ”, inclusive, as frivolous, irrelevant, redundant, and unnecessary.
Relating briefly past history, to allow a proper understanding of the situation that existed at the time of the commencement of the present action, the moving papers disclose the following state of facts: After partial trial of a separation action brought by Ellis Springer against his wife, Helen M. Springer, in 1937, in this court, in the village…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Halsted v. HalstedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Karminski v. KarminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pass v. PassMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
- F.L.C. v. E.W.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975