Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. Bank of Italy

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The plaintiff bank, as drawee, seeks to recover money paid to the defendant bank, a holder in due course, on a check certified by plaintiff in which the name of the payee had been altered prior to certification, and which check had been indorsed and negotiated by the substituted payee. Under the provisions of section 3143 of the Civil Code (sec. 62, N. I. L.), “The acceptor by accepting the instrument engages that he will pay it according to the tenor of his acceptance and admits (1) the existence of the drawer, the genuineness of his signature, and his capacity and authority to draw the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. First National Bank v. Northwestern National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. N. B'k of C. in N.Y. v. . N.M. B'k A. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Espy v. Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Wright v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Umbsen v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Cowles v. Independent Elevator Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. Ford County State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API