People v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
The appellant was convicted of burglary in the second degree and after denial of his motion for a new trial, was sentenced to imprisonment in San Quentin, where he is now incarcerated. He appeals from the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict and from the order denying a new trial on the grounds that the wholly circumstantial evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and that prejudicial error resulted from alleged misconduct of the district attorney and from the trial court’s abuse of discretion in denying his motion for a new trial.
The commission of the burglary is undisputed.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. TuthillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Louise Orebo and Tom Gore, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. MacCagnanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. CartierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.