Legal Opinion
Flores v. Merced Irrigation District
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 9, 2010No. Case CV F 09-1529 LJO DLBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
By notice filed on September 15, 2010, Defendant Merced Irrigation District (“MID”) seeks summary judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff Rodrigo Flores filed an opposition to the motion on October 15, 2010. Defendant filed a reply on November 1, 2010. 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 280(g), this matter was submitted on the pleadings without oral argument and the hearing was vacated. Having considered the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richardson v. Bertram's Salmon River Brewery, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
- Saqqa v. San Joaquin CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Tamakloe v. Vertex Aerospace, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025