Legal Opinion
Fransen v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1932No. File No. 7168PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.
Plaintiff has instituted this action in this court predicating jurisdiction and authority to sue upon section 2109, R. C. 1919, reading as follows: “It shall be competent for any person deeming himself aggrieved by the refusal of the state auditor to allow any just claim against the state, to commence an action against the state by filing with the clerk of the supreme court a complaint setting forth fully and particularly the nature of the claim. He shall at the same time file an undertaking in the penal sum of five hundred dollars, with two or more sureties, to be approved by the state…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hudson Structural Steel Co. v. Smith & Rumery Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
- Bennett v. CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Brown v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Tyra v. CheneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Buckberg v. Washburn-Crosby Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beatty v. DepueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. First National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Foulke v. SuurmeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. RudenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.