Hudson Structural Steel Co. v. Smith & Rumery Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On report. This is an action of assumpsit brought by the Hudson Structural Steel 'Company against the defendant to recover the value of certain structural steel roof framing furnished by the plaintiff as subcontractor to the defendant, the general contractor, for the school for the Feeble Minded at West Pownal. The case was referred to Mr. Justice Savage and is reported to the Law Court for final determination upon the facts as reported by the Referee and upon the record.
Read the full summary
On report. This is an action of assumpsit brought by the Hudson Structural Steel 'Company against the defendant to recover the value of certain structural steel roof framing furnished by the plaintiff as subcontractor to the defendant, the general contractor, for the school for the Feeble Minded at West Pownal. The case was referred to Mr. Justice Savage and is reported to the Law Court for final determination upon the facts as reported by the Referee and upon the record. Plea, the general issue, with brief statement claiming in substance that the plaintiff, without lawful excuse, failed to…
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
This case comes’up on tlie f olio wing-’stipulation: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the above - entitled cause shall be reported to the Law Court for'-fihal decision upon the.f^cts as reported by the Referee; that'.the record of the.case on report shall include the pleadings, the rule of reference, the report of the Referee and this stipulation, that the evidence need not be printed but that the official stenographer’s typewritten transcript, o.f the same may be used before the Law Court by either party in the manner and to the extent stated in the Refereee’s report.” In view of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Long v. Inhabitants of AtholMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Welles v. . YatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Vickery v. RitchieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Furman v. . Union Pacific R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Town of Essex v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blue Rock Industries v. Raymond International, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Frederich v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Puget Sound National Bank v. SelivanoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Ashby v. GibbonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.