Legal Opinion

Earle v. Dawes

High Court of Chancery of Maryland

Decided July 15, 1849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[The facts of the case necessary for an understanding of the Chancellor’s opinion are sufficiently set out therein.]

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

This case, which is submitted upon arguments, in writing, of the solicitors of the parties, presents two questions.

The first depends upon the construction of the Act of 1825, ch. 156, relating to illegitimate children. It appears that the defendant, B. M. Dawes, son of Mrs. Dawes, is an illegitimate child, and that his mother, Elizabeth Dawes, died intestate, leaving this son and other children horn in lawful wedlock, and the question now raised is, whether this illegitimate son is entitled to participate in the estate of his mother as co-heir with the other children.

*231The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1831

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bassett v. BudlongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Watts v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Barron v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Rowe v. CullenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API