Legal Opinion

State v. Butenhoff

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1992No. C1-91-1606PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

A jury found appellant Rhonda S. Buten-hoff guilty of felony assault in the second degree and misdemeanor theft. She was sentenced concurrently to 21 months imprisonment. During cross-examination of appellant at the trial, and over the objection of appellant’s attorney, the prosecutor was allowed to questio'n her about unrelated incidents of domestic abuse and bad conduct. Appellant asserts that this evidence unjustifiably prejudiced her and deprived her of her constitutional right to a fair trial. She demands reversal of the assault conviction and a new trial on that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. BlackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. State v. CurrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Black v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API