Legal Opinion
Royal China, Inc. v. Regal China Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
Plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Ohio. Defendant is a New York corporation, which according to the complaint, does no business in the State of Ohio nor do any of its officers, directors or agents reside in that State. It owns 16,020 shares or 23% of the 70,000 outstanding shares of stock of plaintiff corporation.
The action is equitable, and the complaint demands judgment against defendant (1) permanently enjoining defendant from transferring or dealing in the shares of stock it owns in plaintiff corporation except only to surrender these certificates to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Shields v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shumaker v. UTEX EXPLORATION COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1957
- Jamil v. Southridge Cooperative, Section 4, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Royal China, Inc. v. Regal China Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952