Legal Opinion
Fernandez v. DeLeno
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 25, 1999No. 96 Civ. 5476(BDP)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, JR., District Judge.
Cross-claim defendant the City of New Rochelle (the “City”) and third-party defendants Patrick Carroll, Dominic Capio, Rhoda Quash, Tim Idoni, and Robert De-Leno (the “individual defendants”) move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 56 against third-party plaintiffs Gary Lucchese and John DeLeno.
The third-party plaintiffs’ sole claim against the individual defendants and third cross-claim against the City is pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for false arrest and malicious prosecution in violation of the Fourth Amendment…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brogdon v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Archie Comic Publications, Inc. v. DeCarloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Larsen v. JBC Legal Group, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Camacho v. BrandonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.