Legal Opinion

Wineland v. Security Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 1964No. 5-3376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.

This appeal relates to the construction of a trust instrument. Arthur Wine-land, an elderly widower, who contemplated remarriage, on February 9, 1959, conveyed certain farm lands (being all the property that he owned) to the Security Bank & Trust Company, as trustee. The bank executed a declaration of trust, the construction of which is now before this court. The trust instrument provides that the beneficiaries are Arthur Wineland (the settlor), the widow of Arthur Wineland, two sons, Albert Wineland and Oscar Wineland, and a daughter, Winnie Wineland Fletcher.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weeks v. WeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Rogoski v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. AycockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. First National Bank v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Aycock Pontiac, Inc. v. AycockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Dunklin v. RamsaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Dunklin v. RamsaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API