Legal Opinion

Rawls & Associates v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 2001No. COA00-567PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Mr. and Mrs. Hurst appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. We conclude the trial court committed no error.

Mr. and Mrs. Hurst own a tract of land in Chocowinity, North Carolina (the Property). On 9 October 1996 the Hursts agreed to sell two lots (Out Parcels) and to lease a portion of the property (Tract 2) to Rawls for a forty-year term. The contract, as set out in a “Letter of Intent”, contained several conditions to be resolved before the closing date. One condition was to seek approval from the Town of Chocowinity for all zoning permits. Rawls…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Durling v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Memo Money Order Co. v. Davis (In Re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2007
  4. Atlantech Distribution, Inc. v. Land Coast InsulationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  5. Blastmaster Holdings USA, LLC v. Land Coast InsulationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API