Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Freud

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 7, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otto C. Jaeger, S.

In this proceeding for letters of administration the petitioner alleges that he is the sole distributee by virtue of having been adopted by decedent’s only child, Harry Freud. In support of these allegations he has annexed to the petition a copy of the order approving the adoption. In the opinion of the court the order is void on its face.

The adoption proceeding was obviously brought in great haste, during the last few days of Harry Freud’s life, for the purpose of adopting an heir for Sophie Freud, the decedent, who was then an old lady, had been living in a nursing home…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. In re the Adoption of EatonNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. United States Trust Co. v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  4. In re the Accounting of MacEwanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jahnke v. JahnkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Venables v. AyresCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. In Re Adoption of BradfieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. In re the Adoption of Baby T.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. WilbournCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API