Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kerns v. Simmers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2018No. 2016–1011PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWine, J.

*432*104{¶ 1} In this original mandamus action, a group of landowners ("the landowners") seeks an order compelling the Ohio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management ("the division") and its chief, Richard Simmers, to commence appropriation proceedings to compensate the landowners for their land that was included in an oil-and-gas drilling unit. The chief issued an order requiring that a reservoir of oil and gas underlying multiple tracts of land be operated as a unit to recover the oil and gas. The landowners object to the order, claiming that it amounted to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. State ex rel. Willis v. SheboyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Cartmell v. DorrianOhio Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Roush v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Fipps v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State ex rel. Cox v. Youngstown Civ. Serv. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Squire v. PhippsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Charley v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API