Carroll v. Bowling
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether executors, who>, in distributing an estate, wrongly turned a fund over to a life tenant without investing it so- as. to protect the remaindermen, and who, consequently, are required to make good to the remaindermen a loss sustained during the life tenancy, may now, after the death of the life tenant, demand reimbursement from other property owned by her absolutely, and about to be distributed, to, or to vest in, her legatees and devisees, including the remaindermen of the first fund. The question comes up on pleadings only, being raised by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Prince De Bearn v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- American Bonding Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Hanson v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
- Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Zollickoffer v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oxenham v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Smith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Smith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985