Legal Opinion
State v. Wickstrom
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1986No. 85-1694-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.
The issue in this case is whether a bail forfeiture judgment entered pursuant to sec. 969.13(4), Stats., 1 is subject to the appeal provisions of sec. 808.04 2 or sec. (Rule) 809.30(1)(f). 3
The court of appeals held that such appeals were subject to the provisions of sec. 808.04, Stats., and dismissed the defendant’s appeal as untimely.
On March 19,1985, the Honorable Earl Schmidt of the Shawano county circuit court signed an order and judgment forfeiting $7,118.58 of James P. Wickstrom’s $10,000 bail bond. The order was entered on March 26, 1985. The proceedings on the bail forfeiture were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- United States v. PlechnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Glenn Richard Roher, International Fidelity Insurance Company, SuretyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- State v. AscencioCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Rafael Santiago, Appeal of Esther CruzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Ryder v. Society InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997