Legal Opinion

Morphosys AG v. Janssen Biotech, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 25, 2019No. C.A. No. 16-221-LPSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARK, U.S District Judge

MorphoSys, Inc. ("MorphoSys" or "Plaintiff") sued Janssen Biotech, Inc., Genmab US, Inc., and Genmab A/S (together, "Janssen" or "Defendants") for infringement of three patents on antibodies that bind to the CD38 protein. (D.I. 205) Pending before the Court are summary judgment motions filed by both sides. Janssen moves for summary judgment of (1) non-infringement of the "human" antibody claims (D.I. 384) and (2) invalidity for lack of written description, lack of enablement, and indefiniteness (D.I. 382). MorphoSys moves for summary judgment of no invalidity for lack…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amgen Inc. v. Coherus Biosciences Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
  2. Amgen Inc. v. SanofiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  3. Baxalta Incorporated v. Bayer HealthCare LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
  4. Spinal Generations, LLC v. DePuy Synthes, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals International GmbH v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API