Legal Opinion

Powell v. James, Hereford & McClelland, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 3, 1989No. 77113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

The issues to be decided on this appeal concern the correctness of jury instructions regarding the duty of a plaintiff in a fraud case to use ordinary care to discover the fraud, and the duty of one signing a document to read it first. Appellant brought this suit against appellee, an insurance agency, to recover damages allegedly arising from appellee’s failure to procure insurance for appellant. Basic to appellant’s case is his contention that appellee, by filling in wrong information on an application appellant swore he signed in blank, caused appellant’s application for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia Society of Plastic Surgeons, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Stewart v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Johnson v. BogdisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Youngblood v. MockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. Burger King Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
  2. Brown Realty Associates, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Trulove v. Woodmen of World Life Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. James, Hereford & McClelland, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  5. Bush v. AG S. Farm CreditCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API