Legal Opinion
Dubay v. Wells
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 17, 2006No. 06-11016-BCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND AWARDING COSTS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
LAWSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by the defendants and intervening defendant in this action initiated by plaintiff Matthew Dubay, who seeks a declaration that Michigan’s paternity statutes are unconstitutional. Dubay also asks for an injunction to prevent the defendants from prosecuting a paternity action against him in the Saginaw County, Michigan circuit court. The motions were argued in open court on June 24, 2006.
According to the pleadings, Dubay commenced a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dubay v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Fharmacy Records v. NassarDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Fharmacy Records v. NassarDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Dubay v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007