Legal Opinion

State v. Aranguren

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 30, 1985No. 14499-5-I; 14608-4-IPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

—Emilio Crespo Aranguren and Guillermo Duquesne-Valera appeal their convictions for possession of stolen property in the third degree. Their cases, tried separately at the trial court level, have been consolidated on appeal. Both appellants argue that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence that was obtained from an allegedly illegal investigatory stop.

On January 8, 1984, at approximately 7 p.m., Officer Gill of the Bellingham Police Department was patrolling by car when he received a report of vandalism. Officer Gill testified that "the call was of three people doing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ArmentaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RankinWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. MennegarWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. EllwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API