Legal Opinion

Mudge v. Bank of America

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided October 24, 2014No. 13-cv-421-JDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE John J. Mudge, Jr. and Lisa Mudge v. Civil No. 13-cv-421-JD Opinion No.

2014 DNH 223

Bank of America, N.A. and TD Bank, N.A. O R D E R John J. Mudge, Jr. and Lisa Mudge move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), to alter or amend the judgment entered in favor of the defendants. In support, they point to newly discovered evidence and argue that the court made errors in granting summary judgment in favor of Bank of America. Bank of America objects. Standard of Review Rule 59(e) allows a motion to alter or amend a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aybar v. Crispin-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. Markel American Insurance v. Díaz-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Alicea v. MacHete MusicCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. Deka Int'l S.A. Luxemborg v. Genzyme Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  5. County Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API