Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Hruska

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1955No. A-5032PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action against our petitioner, the City of Houston, for personal injury to one of its employees, the respondent Hruska, and involves as a primary point the alleged estoppel of the City to assert as a defense its otherwise applicable charter provision requiring written notice of such a claim within 90 days from the date of the injury.

A judgment upon a verdict favorable to the respondent-plaintiff was affirmed by the Waco Court of Civil Appeals on transfer. 272 S.W.2d 778.

The accident in question occurred on April 17, 1948, while Hruska was working as a laborer with a crew engaged in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Phillips v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. SchmidtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Haltom CityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bowman v. Lumberton Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. City of Houston v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. City of Houston v. DeshotelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Morales v. City of GalvestonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API