Legal Opinion

Rockwell International, Inc. v. Pos-a-traction Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 1983No. 82-5645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In state and federal actions brought by Rockwell International, Inc., against Paul Krech and Pacific Northwest Pos-A-Traction, Inc., the parties agreed, per a Stipulation and Order, to “double caption” Krech’s deposition to permit its use in both suits. The stipulation provided Krech’s deposition *1325would be taken in two sessions, one in Tacoma, Washington, the other in Los Angeles. The deposition was begun in Tacoma by Rockwell’s attorney in the state action, but was not completed. The parties agreed to continue the deposition in Los Angeles to permit Rockwell’s attorney in the state action to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Fremont Energy Corporation v. The Seattle Post Intelligencer, the Hearst Corporation, John E. Moss, Chairman, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
  2. Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
  3. Rockwell International, Inc. v. Pos-A-Traction Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API