Legal Opinion

Patton v. Paradise Hills Shopping Center, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 2, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 185PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The appellants were the plaintiffs in the Superior Court. The trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Judgment was entered in conformity with these rulings and the matter was brought before us on appeal. The main issue before us is the sufficiency of the record to establish an enforceable contract in relation to the claimed right to compel the transfer of a long-term lease of land improved by a building. There are other issues incident to and contingent upon the main issue.

Plaintiff Patton is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stevens v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Magma Copper Company v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wakeham v. Omega Construction CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Durham v. DoddArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Davies v. LanginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, MdCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Modla v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Abernethy v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Fridena v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Biondo v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API