Biondo v. General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Judge.
The plaintiffs are the appellants. The defendants are the appellees, and will be referred to as General Motors and as Courtesy. General Motors and Courtesy filed separate motions for summary judgment. Both motions were granted and judgments were entered pursuant thereto. This appeal followed. The record discloses an insufficient presentation of issues and a consequent abandonment of the appeal in relation to the judgment in favor of Courtesy. We will limit our consideration of the issues presented in relation to the judgment in favor of General Motors.
The basic question before…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Madeirense Do Brasil S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Lujan v. MacMurtrieArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Pickwick Stages Corp. v. MessingerArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Sarti v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gulf Insurance v. GrishamArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Byars v. Arizona Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Hegel v. O'Malley Ins. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Compton v. National Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Caruth v. MarianiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.