Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brasseur

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 1956No. 959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCleary, J.

This is an action of tort for the alleged negligence of the defendant in operating his automobile, which resulted in personal injuries to the plaintiff. Trial was by jury with a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant moved for a directed verdict in his favor. After verdict and before judgment the defendant moved that the verdict be set aside and that judgment be entered for the defendant. To the overruling of each of these motions the defendant was allowed exceptions. He has briefed them together and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duchaine, B.N.F. v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
  3. Collins v. FoggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. Hill v. StringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  5. Bombard v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Howard Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  2. Harold D. Worden v. Alfred Courtemanche, Jr., and Hinsdale Volunteer Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Smith v. BrasseurSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API