Sisk v. Sisk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
A judge who did not preside at trial had no jurisdiction to rule on a Rule 59 motion for new trial. We consider the motion for a new trial de novo on appeal, and hold it to be without merit.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Kathy Lynn Sisk (plaintiff) and Glenn L. Sisk (defendant) were once married, but are now divorced. On 17 January 2006, plaintiff filed a complaint, which asserted several claims for relief, including a claim for equitable distribution of marital property. On 26 January 2006, defendant filed an answer and counterclaim, which also sought equitable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Hoots v. CalawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Graves v. WalstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Dixon v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- GEMINI DRILLING AND FOUNDATION, LLC v. National Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Potts v. Kel, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021
- Akshar Distribution Co. v. Smoky's MartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Akshar Distribution Co. v. Smoky's MartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Davis v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Davis v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.