Naftel v. Osborn
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from tbe Probate Court of Crenshaw. Tried before Hon. B. A. Walked. Proceeding by Marietta E. S. Osborn as administratrix of tlie estate of D. L. Osborn, deceased, for the settlement of her administration. One J. H. Naftel contested the claims of credit made by the administratrix.
Read the full summary
Appeal from tbe Probate Court of Crenshaw. Tried before Hon. B. A. Walked. Proceeding by Marietta E. S. Osborn as administratrix of tlie estate of D. L. Osborn, deceased, for the settlement of her administration. One J. H. Naftel contested the claims of credit made by the administratrix. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. cited Byrd, et dl. v. Jones, Admr. 84 Ala. 336; Shelton v. Carpenter, 60 Ala. 201; Bates v. Vary, 40 Ala. 421; Kimball v. Moody, 27 Ala. 130; Smith v. Bryant, 60 Ala. 235. (No brief came to the hands of the reporter.)
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, O. J.
D. L. Osborn died May 25, 1890. Marietta E. S. Osborn was appointed administratrix of his estate July 4,1890. There appears to have been a will, but it cuts no figure in the case. In October, 1891, the administratrix reported the estate insolvent, and at the November term, 1891, of the Probate Court it was declared insolvent. In December, 1891, the administratrix filed her account current of her administration, in which she charged herself with about $910 assets received, and claimed credits for about the same, or a larger sum paid out. The settlement was had at the March term,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNeill's Adm'r v. McNeill's CreditorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Mitcham v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Tayloe v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Shelton v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Marx v. NelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of HarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Snead v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Brammer v. PettyjohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Boland v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894