In Re Estate of Harsh
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Morling, J. —
The contention of the defendants, in substance, is that the order of the probate court authorizing the administratrix to continue the business of the deceased is void; that plaintifi! depositors' claims were never ified, and particularly not filed within six months, and therefore plaintiffs are not entitled to the status of claimants,-at least, to that of claimants of the third class, or as having priority over defendants.
James B. Harsh in his lifetime owned and operated a private bank, under the name of “The Land Credit Bank.” It was a bank of deposit. A part of his business was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Goodrich v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Ryan v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Deery v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Nichols v. HarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- In Re Estate of NicholsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- In Re Trusteeship Under Will of LawsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- In Re Estate of MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- In Re Report of AtkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.