Legal Opinion

Maroney v. Iacobsohn

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 2015No. B249890APublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, Acting P. J.—

INTRODUCTION

This appeal principally concerns the jurisdictional deadlines for noticing and ruling on a motion for new trial under Code of Civil Procedure 1 sections 659 and 660. Specifically, we must decide whether service of notice of entry of judgment by the party moving for new trial triggers the statutes’ jurisdictional deadlines. We hold that it does not.

The appeal arises from a rear-end automobile accident; however, the issues presented are entirely procedural. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Keely Maroney…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Van Beurden Insurance Services v. Customized Worldwide Weather Insurance AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. La Manna v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Palmer v. GTE California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Crown Castle NG Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Phipps v. Copeland CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Prince v. Pletcher CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API