Legal Opinion

Manna v. Diebold Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 2, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

The plaintiff obtained a verdict in her action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by her when she fell crossing Main Street, Worcester, near the Worcester County Trust Company where at least one truck was standing within a roped off enclosure. The bill of exceptions presents the question whether the trial judge correctly denied the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

There was evidence from which it could have been found that the plaintiff slipped on a piece of rope “brown and . . . about % inch thick” similar to the rope used to mark off *755the enclosure. The testimony…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. D'Addio v. Hinckley Rendering Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Heywood v. OgasapianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Burwick v. McClureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Gallagher v. R. E. Cunniff, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Cochrane v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Malley v. R. Zoppo Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Bradstreet v. A.R. Belli, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991
  3. Epstein v. William H. Porter Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1964
  4. Rome v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API