Legal Opinion

O'Malley v. R. Zoppo Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 8, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

In this action for trespass to land, conversion of loam, gravel, and fill, and, under G. L. c. 242, § 7, destruction of trees and underwood, the trial judge granted the defendant company’s motion for a directed verdict, and the plaintiff took an exception. The record consists of a substitute bill of exceptions in which much of the testimony appears in condensed paraphrase.

The defendant company had a contract with the State and city to enclose a brook and construct drainage improvements in a strip running in part through the plaintiff’s land on which the Department of Public Works had taken an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Smith v. Rapid Transit Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Howes v. KelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Nugent v. Popular Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Calderone v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Soares v. Lakeville Baseball Camp, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Blais-Porter, Inc. v. SimboliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Bairstow v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  4. Commercial Plastics & Supply Corp. v. Ace Dasher Systems, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API