Legal Opinion

Byers v. Consol. Aluminum Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 1994-1200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 51.] BYERS ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CONSOLIDATED ALUMINUM CORPORATION ET AL.; STAMCO CORPORATION, APPELLANT. [Cite as Byers v. Consol. Aluminum Corp.,

1995-Ohio-216.] Civil actions—Products liability claims for bodily injury governed by two-year statute of limitations period in R.C. 2305.10 and not by six-year statute of limitations period in R.C. 2305.07. (No. 94-1200—Submitted July 12, 1995—Decided August 16, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Monroe County, No. 716. __________________ Wiles, Doucher, Van Buren…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McAuliffe v. Western States Import Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Byers v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Natl. Prescription Opiate LitigationOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Carrel v. Allied Products Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API