Legal Opinion

Hartford Insurance Co. of the Southeast v. Pearson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1986No. 85-1127PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLBATH, WALTER N., Jr., Associate Judge.

Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast, defendant below, appeals the trial court’s entry of final judgment in favor of Jodi Ann Pearson, plaintiff below. Two points were raised on appeal, one of which is moot having been amicably resolved by the parties. The remaining point on appeal is stated as follows:

*1191WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN HOLDING AS A MATTER OF LAW THAT APPELLEE’S PARENTS HAD NOT MADE A KNOWING REJECTION OF HIGHER UNINSURED MOTORIST LIMITS UNDER THE POLICY OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE WITH APPELLANT.

For the following reasons we answer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kimbrell v. Great American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Travelers Ins. Co. v. SpencerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. KauffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Bankers Ins. Co. v. VasquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Lancaster Oil Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Auger v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Riggsby v. West American Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API