Legal Opinion
Lancaster Oil Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided January 30, 1980No. 78-0092PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HIGBY, District Judge.
This is an action by Lancaster Oil Company, Inc. (hereinafter Lancaster Oil), for a judicial declaration 1 that its Policy Number 21C795198 with Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company includes uninsured motorists protection limits of $100,000 per individual and $300,000 per accident and for reformation of the policy to reflect those limits. The citizenships of the parties are diverse, and the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000. The court has jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1977).
On its face, the policy limits uninsured motorists protection to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- C. Louis Wood and Hallie D. Wood v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- John Factor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- English and American Ins. Co. v. Swain Groves, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Angel R. Santana v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- William Thiem v. The Hertz Corporation, D/B/A the Hertz Corporation Car Leasing DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Baum v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Spaulding v. AMERICAN FIRE & INDEM CODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Bedoya v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.