Legal Opinion

Von Rosen v. Dean

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 2, 1930No. 4952PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment on demurrer to a declaration which attempts to make a case for the recovery of usurious interest under sections 1180 and 1181 of the Code; and also under the Act of Congress of February 4, 1913, 37 Stat. 657, commonly called the Loan Shark Law.

It appears from the declaration that on the 6th day of June, 1927, the plaintiff purchased certain real estate, on which he assumed the payment of certain notes secured by a deed of trust. Thei unpaid balance on the notes at the time of the purchase amounted to $177,500. Shortly after the…

2Cited by13 opinions

Hartman v. LubarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
MONTGOMERY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N v. BaerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Equitable Life Insurance Co. In Re Parkwood, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Parkwood, Inc. v. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. In Re Adams Properties, Inc. American Security and Trust Co., Trustee in Reorganization of Adams Properties, Inc. v. Hartford Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
Atlantic Life Ins. Co. of Richmond v. WolfDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
Torosian v. National Capital Bank of WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.