Legal Opinion

Fairchild v. Dean

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1939No. 27197. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

These four actions were consolidated “for all purposes as a single case.” The first action was to recover for personal injuries and damages to an automobile. In the other three, the respective plaintiffs sought to recover for personal injuries. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that no recovery could be had. From the judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiffs have appealed.

No statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been brought to this court. The case is here for determination upon the findings made by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Benson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Martin v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wilsey-Bennett Trucking Company, a Corporation v. A. W. Frost and M. K. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Wiggins v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Comstock v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hotel Roslyn LLC v. AmGuard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API