Legal Opinion
Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 3, 2005No. 2004-1475PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted final judgment to Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation and Union Carbide Corporation (collectively Union Carbide) after a jury found that Shell Oil Company, Shell Chemical Company, and CRI Catalyst Company (collectively Shell) infringed claim 4 of Union Carbide’s U.S. Patent No. 4,916,243 (the ’243 patent). Union Carbide Chems. & Plastics Tech. Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., No. Civ. 99-CV-274-SLR, Civ. 99-846-SLR, 2004 WL 1305849 (D.Del. June 9, 2004) (Union Carbide III). Because…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Carl B. Bai v. L & L Wings, Inc., D/B/A Wings, and Great World Co. Of New York Ltd., and Elufa Fashions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Wechsler v. MacKe International Trade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.