L. Straus & Sons v. Wanamaker
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 160, Jan. T., 1896, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1895, No. 121, overruling exceptions to referee’s report. Amicable action of assumpsit to secure tbe construction of a contract.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 160, Jan. T., 1896, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1895, No. 121, overruling exceptions to referee’s report. Amicable action of assumpsit to secure tbe construction of a contract. The case was referred to Hon. Mayer Sulzberger as referee, under the act of May 14, 1874, P. L. 166. Tbe referee reported as follows : Tbe undersigned, to whom by tbe written agreement of tbe parties to the above entitled cause, dated October 23,1894, and November 12, 1894 (which agreement is hereto annexed and marked ‘‘No. 1 ”), was referred tbe settlement of tbe…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The correctness of the learned'referee’s rulings, on which the judgment is based, is so amply vindicated in his very able and exhaustive report, that it is wholly unnecessary for us to add anything thereto. We are all satisfied from an examination of the record that there is nothing therein to justify us in sustaining any of the specifications of error.
The judgment is therefore affirmed on the report of the referee.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Royle Mining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Harrity v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Baldwin v. MagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Bean v. Aetna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.