Legal Opinion

Toucey v. Schell

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action upon a bond given by a trustee for faithful! performance of his duty.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

The testator in his lifetime, together with John A. Foley^ Daniel -B. Allen, Arthur IT. Eoley and Elizabeth Foley, executed a several bond by which he and the other persons became severally bound to Louise P. ' W. Foley (wife of John A. Foley), Charles E. Heartt and Harold Heartt, infant children of said Louise P. W. Foley, and unto whomsoever else it may concern, the said John A. Eoley in the penal sum of $170,000, the said Daniel P. Allen in the *351penal sum of $100,000, the said Edward Schell in the penal sum of $30,000, and the said Arthur M. Foley in the penal sum of $10,000, and the said ■…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Armitage v. . PulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Field v. Van CottNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wanamaker v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Hart v. SicklesNew York Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API